Good stuff:
Youth - Matt Chandler - TGC 2011 from The Gospel Coalition on Vimeo.
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Rap balle: Keynes vs. Hayek Round 2
So good. Thanks for posting this Steve...here's the video link on the blog
Tim Keller on the Exodus from the recent Gospel Co. conference
Yep, this is a long video. And yes, its worth your time. Take a lunch hour and feed the soul:
Getting Out - Tim Keller - TGC 2011 from The Gospel Coalition on Vimeo.
Getting Out - Tim Keller - TGC 2011 from The Gospel Coalition on Vimeo.
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Monday, April 25, 2011
Moral Poverty? Can the 'is' around us provide workable 'oughts?'
Consistency, that is, the logical consistency of the outworking of a system, is telling.
Food for thought:
http://subversivethinking.blogspot.com/search/label/the%20moral%20poverty%20of%20atheism%20and%20naturalism
Food for thought:
http://subversivethinking.blogspot.com/search/label/the%20moral%20poverty%20of%20atheism%20and%20naturalism
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Sunday is coming
Join us at DSC tomorrow, 730, 9, and 1045. Caite is singing a sweet song, and the message will be one of hope and new life. HT: JT.
Thursday, April 21, 2011
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Monday, April 11, 2011
Thursday, April 7, 2011
Bill Craig's debate with Laurence Krauss on evidence for the existence of God
This is worth a watch. Here's part 1 (with the other parts attached):
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Justification vs. Explanatory force: religious a-theism
Burgess has some interesting thoughts on the subject:
http://keithburgess-jackson.typepad.com/blog/2011/04/religion.html
I've been considering this issue in a variety of contexts lately:
1. Reading Nietzsche, he offers an incredibly persuasive explanatory counter example to the state religion, platonic Christianity, of his day. Indeed, his critique has often led me to say, "it's either the worldview of Jesus' or Zarathustra...there can be no middle ground." I'm not sure that's right, but in a world without God, his thesis, explanation by psychological genealogy, is highly intuitive and seems logically conclusive. If man is alone, power dynamics seem to explain what we call good and bad.
2. Mike Butler's statement, "all men have a worldview, thus all are religious."
3. Which build's off of Godel's famous discovery that logical/mathematical systems are incomplete without axiomatic indemonstrable assumptions. That is, every system has presuppositions which it takes on faith to hold it together.
4. So, one question is: which conceptual scheme offers the most plausible explanation? Another question is, which explanation can justify, or account for the ground of, the idea of truth, plausibility, and explanation in the first place.
5. Regardless, we should admit our finitude, and that those who hold beliefs, theists and non-theists, are not only responsible to explain but also to provide warrant. This quest leads to questions of normatively and authority, which leads to the question of who's first principal (what kind of first principal) can hold all things together. This is, ultimately, what we are putting our faith in.
HT: Steve Hays
http://keithburgess-jackson.typepad.com/blog/2011/04/religion.html
I've been considering this issue in a variety of contexts lately:
1. Reading Nietzsche, he offers an incredibly persuasive explanatory counter example to the state religion, platonic Christianity, of his day. Indeed, his critique has often led me to say, "it's either the worldview of Jesus' or Zarathustra...there can be no middle ground." I'm not sure that's right, but in a world without God, his thesis, explanation by psychological genealogy, is highly intuitive and seems logically conclusive. If man is alone, power dynamics seem to explain what we call good and bad.
2. Mike Butler's statement, "all men have a worldview, thus all are religious."
3. Which build's off of Godel's famous discovery that logical/mathematical systems are incomplete without axiomatic indemonstrable assumptions. That is, every system has presuppositions which it takes on faith to hold it together.
4. So, one question is: which conceptual scheme offers the most plausible explanation? Another question is, which explanation can justify, or account for the ground of, the idea of truth, plausibility, and explanation in the first place.
5. Regardless, we should admit our finitude, and that those who hold beliefs, theists and non-theists, are not only responsible to explain but also to provide warrant. This quest leads to questions of normatively and authority, which leads to the question of who's first principal (what kind of first principal) can hold all things together. This is, ultimately, what we are putting our faith in.
HT: Steve Hays
Saturday, April 2, 2011
Einstein vs. Hawking: Epic Rap Battles of History (for the Doc)
HT: Tastefully Offensive
Best line from the auto-tuned S. Hawking..."there are 10 million million, etc...particles in the universe, yo mama took the ugly ones and put em into one nerd!"
Best line from the auto-tuned S. Hawking..."there are 10 million million, etc...particles in the universe, yo mama took the ugly ones and put em into one nerd!"
Friday, April 1, 2011
Boomers 'sticking it to the man' while stuck on synchronized hogs
This is a great little afternoon snack for all my motorcycle brethren:
http://maverickphilosopher.typepad.com/maverick_philosopher/2011/04/harley-davidson-stickin-it-to-the-man.html
http://maverickphilosopher.typepad.com/maverick_philosopher/2011/04/harley-davidson-stickin-it-to-the-man.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)